Until about an hour before it was scheduled to take place, the Harvard Extension School’s Cultural Studies Club planned to hold a “black mass”, a ritual originally performed to parody and denigrate sacred teachings of the Catholic Church. It was finally moved from the campus location and then canceled because of a reported “break-down in communication” between personnel at the alternate venue location and the organizers. The event, co-sponsored by a New York-based Satanic Temple, planned to hold the mass in an undisclosed location to “reaffirm their respect for the Satanic faith”.
The organizers claimed that the purpose of the exercise was to educate participants about the historical ritual.
Harvard president Drew Faust published a statement that referred to the club’s decision to hold the ritual as “abhorrent”, but maintained that doing so was “consistent with the University’s commitment to free expression”.
Catholic leaders in the Boston area called for a prayerful response, and a “Holy Hour”, consisting of the Catholic practice of Adoration of the Holy Eucharist, was to take place simultaneously to the satanic event. President Faust, according to his statement, planned to attend.
I have been hearing about the Harvard goings-ons for several weeks, not on mainstream news channels, but on sources more focused on policies and events that affect Christianity as a whole, and Catholics in particular. I have been surprised that this news hasn’t made it to the Yahoo or MSN pages, at least not that I’ve seen, and I can’t say that I’ve noted that opinions about the “black mass” taking place have “trended” anywhere in particular.
So I have had opportunity to quietly ponder my reaction–an anomaly in today’s news blitzing society, where each of 17 separate points of view on any given subject bombards me the moment I turn on the television, look at my phone, or open my computer.
I am, quite literally, sick to my stomach. I believe that the Eucharist is the living and breathing body of Christ. Anyone who also holds that view would feel the same way about a ritual that denigrates and mocks the Catholic practice of partaking in this Sacrament.
But I am American. And though I’ve grown, I’m an American with liberal roots. So I must force myself to consider this through the eyes of free speech. And so I have.
My humble opinion is that that the act of having a black mass is not illegal.
But the reality that young people at a University known to be a source of future world leaders would willingly organize and attend such an event is deeply troubling. So I turn to this question. How have they made this feel acceptable to themselves?
Some of my like-minded Catholic friends have pshawed the notion that the mass was being held for educational purposes. “Do we need to hold a 60’s style lynching so that we can all see what that felt like to witness?” they ask. While an arguably just comparison from the point of view of a staunch Catholic, it is likely too provocative to promote useful debate with non-Catholics.
Perhaps there is a better, more apt comparison.
The Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C., is anything but disrespectful of the Jewish experience of genocide and ritualistic mockery of Jewish thought and tradition, yet one is able to give “witness” and be “educated” in the history of the era. The Cultural Studies Club at Harvard, if truly wishing to learn from their enactments, would do well to emulate the museum’s brilliant example. If I were in the mood to be provocative myself, I might also point out that I don’t think the museum’s creators consulted any existing Nazi organization with requests for them to reenact any of the abuse or denigration that went on during the period being studied. The Harvard Club, you will note, aligned themselves with a satanic temple in New York–akin here to the Nazis, in case you weren’t making the connection.
I also wonder about the comparative absence of media attention. Terry Jones, the Gainseville, FL pastor who made a habit of burning Korans, garnered attention from military leaders and President Obama himself. He wound up in jail a bunch of times, usually on misuse-of-fire related charges.
Isn’t the burning of the Koran, a sacred document in the Muslim faith, and the denigrating of a Sacrament and the Body of Christ for the Catholic faith, comparable actions?
Another issue, one not discussed to my knowledge except in the Christian and Catholic-focused media, was the initial claim that the black mass organizers planned to use an actual consecrated host. In order to obtain one for the event, someone would have had to attend a real Catholic Mass, pretend to accept the Sacrament of the Eucharist, and then steal the host for his own evil purpose. Yes, evil. It’s not my purpose to debate the theology, but please understand that a consecrated host is not just a representation of Christ’s body. It is Christ’s body.
I know. It’s a complicated concept for Catholics too. But there is no debate among Catholics that this is the teaching.
I wasn’t able to find any kind of definitive result to the claim that a consecrated host was stolen or not stolen, but if it was, that crosses the legal boundary. Theft, obviously. And if we don’t have a law protecting sacred items, be they Torahs, or Korans, or consecrated hosts, then shame on us.
Many have asked me how a social worker with liberal leanings has made it over to the “dark side” of right-handed leanings.
This kind of thing makes it a lot easier to explain.
Our nation was not founded on the principle that we should have freedom from religion, but rather freedom to practice religion. The original settlers were Puritans whose concept of proper living was more rigid than they were able to uphold in England. They came over here so they could do what they wanted, and allow others to do so as well.
Immediately after President George Washington gave his inaugural address, the entire congressional body walked to a nearby Church to have a prayer service.
It’s not just blow-hard right-wingers that maintain our nation was built on the teachings and tenets of Christianity, it is documented fact that this is so.
We have suffered in this country from narrow minds. There have been times, even recently, when alternate lifestyles and viewpoints were met with ridicule or violence. I think that has changed for the most part, and I am glad of it. I have no need for others to believe what I believe or practice what I practice, even as my beliefs are as true to me as the fact that apples come in red, yellow or green, and not in blue, purple or black. (If someone asked you for a purple apple, you would question her, right? If she doesn’t define “apple” or “purple” the same as you do, and you’ve known since you could speak that apples are apples and colors are colors, you would either instruct her correctly or allow her to live in ignorance, right?)
What has become the minority viewpoint seems to engender similar ridicule and non-acceptance as the formerly non-traditional one did. My daughter, an anomaly in her living-with-two-opposite-gendered-married-parents, has few television or other examples of her home life, just as folks with two moms or two dads lacked several years ago.
Admitting that I am married and raising a daughter with my husband, who is also her father, dismisses almost anything else I have to say. I am not worldly, not accepting, too rigid.
And I guess that’s what bothers me most about our best and brightest participating in this black mass.
The Cultural Studies Club at Harvard reportedly were trying to “educate” people about how one group— the Satanic Temple — has a religious ceremony — the “black mass” — whose stated purpose was to mock and vilify another religion and its core belief — the Catholic Church and its belief that Jesus Christ is present in his body, blood, soul, and divinity under the appearances of consecrated bread.
Did they balance their participation in named evil by being present for a Catholic Holy Hour?
Or were these future world leaders only interested in being “educated” about the beliefs that counter that which they personally resist?
Doesn’t make me rest easy about who will be running the country for my grandkids.